The Verdict

Yes…

to frolicking in various oceans during Spring Break.

No…

to being so worn out by Spring Break that you can no longer function.

Faculty Quote

“Ladies, if some guy ever tells you that God told him something that you have to do, tell him to get on a ship!”

- Prof. Pat Ralston, CHOW I, on Virgil’s Aeneid

Fall enrollment still uncertain

Next fall’s enrollment numbers are still murky, according to admissions.
“The number of applications has been high this year,” said Vice President of Admissions Wallace Anderson, “But there is no way to tell if people have committed to the school until their enrollment deposits are in.” Getting prospective students to pay these deposits is top priority for Anderson.
The admissions deadline is May 1st. According to Jeff Hall, Vice President for Academic Affairs, if changes to the budget need to be made, they will be made after all deposits come in. “It’s hard to tell how many will come, we’re still a little in the dark,” said Hall.
After enrollment numbers are more solid, Covenant will know better how to progress with rightsizing initiatives set to be enacted this summer.
On May 15, faculty and staff will gather for a meeting to discover which individuals and programs have been rightsized, according to Hall. A press release will follow later that day.
Schools across the country are experiencing the same effects of the economic situation, according to Hall and Anderson. “Every college like us is having trouble,” Hall said of making projections for the next year. Current predictions of enrollment rely on historical data, which doesn’t work well for the situation many colleges are in due to the economy. “These are untested waters,” Anderson said.
According to Anderson, prospective students need to know the cost of a Covenant education is worth it. “People are more educated consumers,” said Anderson, “and we need to be able to answer their questions.” Even the Financial Aid office has been putting in a lot of work in admissions efforts, said Anderson.
The recently-enacted strategic plan directly addresses the need for improved marketing to high schoolers. The plan emphasizes improved communication of Covenant’s mission. It also seeks to make the college more prominent to PCA students.

Broad Street Film Festival hopes present successes will lead to future growth

BY COLIN STAYTON

The cast and crew of “Fountain of Youth” pose together at the Tivoli awards ceremony
______________________________________________________________________________________________
The excitement was palpable at the Bijou Theatre last Thursday as students piled in to watch the work of their fellow students finally hit the big screen. With its tremendous initial success, hopes are high that the first annual Broad Street Film Festival will see a second year.

The collective effort of Covenant and Bryan College, the Broad Street Film Festival boasted a number of original student films shown for the economical price of $3 a ticket. But next year’s return will require that both schools have the resources, funds, and academic backing to produce another set of awardable student films. This is, so far, only true of Bryan.

The festival was a success because it marked the beginnings of integration between the filmmaking of Covenant and Bryan students. If it becomes a tradition, it is possible and certainly desirable that Broad Street will become less about Covenant films versus Bryan films and more about good films versus bad films. As it is, the Broad Street Film Festival revealed a clear incongruity between the two schools’ aesthetic values.

Despite the schmaltzy acoustic guitar, poor sound editing, and self-aware actors, many of the Bryan films had a noble goal in mind, which was, presumably, to frame the average 20-something’s experience according to a moral code. However, they often landed in the realm of “moralizing,” which at best amused us and at worst made us cringe.

“My Brother’s Keeper,” a contrived retelling of Cain and Abel through a modern day fratricidal thriller, left us with a confusing baptism scene and indifference as to what it meant. Most cringe-worthy, perhaps, was “Give Me a Break!”, whose title predicted the audience’s response with uncanny accuracy.

Some notable exceptions included “A Pistol In Hand,” which refrained from moralizing and so saved itself from being too heavy-handed. It also boasted slick production and good pacing, even though the plot made little sense.

The most successful Bryan film was “You Dropped Your Quarter,” which won the award for Best Short Term Narrative. Its director, Colton Davies, clearly understood the film’s limits and worked within them to create a film that satisfied every goal it set out to accomplish.

On Covenant’s end, Asher Warren won Best Foreign Film for his excellent “Der Zaun,” a slice-of-life short set in Berlin in 1989 which proved that a true-to-life story often provides its own gravitas when you simply tell it.

The clear winner of the night, and winner for Best Long Term Narrative, was “Fountain of Youth,” the brainchild of Orson Welles brought to life by Grant Withington, Drew Belz and Isaiah Smallman.

With a crack cast of actors, timely photomontages, and the charisma of narrator Max Belz, “Fountain of Youth” displayed an intuitive knowledge of the cinematic language. Following Welles’ original script also freed the directors from indulgent voiceovers, an unfortunate recurrence in Bryan films.

What most set “Fountain of Youth” apart from the other films was its treatment of the “Christian aesthetic.” Rather than trying to juggle their Christian values with their craft, Withington, Belz and Smallman simply followed in the footsteps of a great filmmaker. They let the quality of the work testify to their convictions instead of squeezing their faith into the cracks of an ill-conceived plot.

Despite having less formal training and fewer resources, Thursday night’s showings left the distinct impression that Covenant outshined Bryan.

The question is where to go from here. As Dr. Foreman wrote in his recent post on the Wittenberg Floor, the film festival “marks another step in our college’s entry into visual, digital culture.” The movie screen is our generation’s canvas. As the premiere artistic medium, both students and the academic powers-that-be ought to begin intentionally investing in student filmmaking.

According to Professor Hallstrom, they are. In her own Wittenberg Floor post, Dr. Hallstrom noted that considerable effort has been poured into bringing folks like casting director Michael Stark and filmmaker Zena Dell Lowe to campus to teach screen acting and writing.

“The newly formed department of Theatre & Film Studies is currently looking at ways to develop a film concentration or minor as well,” Hallstrom wrote, “But all that takes money and personnel, neither of which is in overabundant supply these days.”

As it stands, Covenant has a roughly equal number of Covenant theatre graduates working in professional film and broadcast media as are involved in professional theatre. Dr. Hallstrom encourages students who are interested in film to take theatre classes while a film concentration is still in the works.

Bolstering film studies opportunities at Covenant may not seem viable in the current economic pinch, but the Broad Street Film Festival simply isn’t a sustainable endeavor for Covenant if the films are purely extracurricular. “Fountain of Youth” required over a week of full-time shooting and months in post-production—none of it for academic credit.

If Covenant’s young filmmakers are to expand and refine their output in the future, their efforts will need school funding and faculty training. If teachers and students can share the same resolve, Covenant’s foray into visual media is imminent.

Staff Editorial: Faithful dialogue in trying times

As the school year draws to a close, big changes are headed Covenant’s way. Rightsizing initiatives and other key components of the strategic plan are set to be effected in May. Some very hard discussions have been held of late among administration, faculty and staff.
During the course of these discussions, Covenant’s philosophy of athletics and policy of recruitment have come under particularly critical scrutiny—especially regarding the prospect of athletics taking on an increasingly prominent role in the recruitment process.
Last week, the online publication Inside Higher Ed ran a story on Covenant College entitled “Broken Covenant.” The article, written by Elizabeth Redden, looks critically at decisions Covenant has recently made during the strategic planning and right-sizing processes.
The article relates Covenant’s issues to a wider struggle that many schools are facing across the nation: “whether an institution should build up athletics at the same time as it cuts academics.”
Redden’s article, and the frank comments that readers subsequently posted, displays the variety of voices and concerns being brought to the table about this issue. While Redden may have overemphasized or oversimplified some aspects of the tensions present in this discussion, the key thing to note is that her article finally brought these concerns out into the open.
Redden mentions the general hesitancy among faculty and staff to be vocal as she researched for her article. “In short, uncertainty is in the air,” she writes. “Faculty critical of the plan declined to be identified by name in news coverage. Multiple Covenant professors, meanwhile, declined or did not respond to requests for interviews.”
As the Bagpipe has sought to understand and cover the developments of this semester, we have encountered the same impediment. Unable to hear the full range of opinions on this matter has, in turn, made it difficult to find our role as students and reporters in the discussion.
The fact that information and meetings have been barred to students is, on one hand, understandable. These discussions are sensitive, tentative, and in the words of one faculty member, “sad.” We want to appropriately respect the privacy of the decision-making process.
Moreover, we have tried to avoid being overhasty in drawing conclusions about the situation. We have listened patiently as various outspoken individuals repeated the seemingly ubiquitous refrains of pitting “faculty” against “staff” and portraying the faculty as composed of sharply polarized warring factions. We sought out the voices of less vocal faculty, and began to discern that while there is certainly a significant polarization of views regarding these issues among more prominent faculty and staff, the dichotomy is nowhere near as stark or distinct as Redden’s article depicts it. There is also a strong middle ground, within which a significant portion of faculty and staff fall as they seek to let the issues develop and wait out these tense and trying times.
However, as a newspaper that seeks to help Covenant students keep the pulse of their school, we do not wish to turn our head from the hard consequences and controversies that have arisen from these difficult discussions.
We want students to know that we are conscious of these issues, but that a lack of information coupled with a desire to be sensitive to the nature of the discussion at hand is what keeps our reports from being as detailed and forthright as we wish they could be.
So, how is Covenant moving forward in this dialogue? The strategic plan has an action item to “review and update the philosophy of athletics,” and this is currently in the works. The administration has scheduled a pair of “town hall” meetings next week for select members of the Covenant community—the first step in the promised discussion process.
“The final goal of this process,” said President Niel Neilson, “is to ensure that we have a mission-driven philosophy of athletics at Covenant that undergirds and directs all that we do athletically.”
As the newspaper, we will continue to report on these issues as they develop. But what is our role as students in light of all this? It’s hard to say, but there are certain things we can do. Pay attention to these issues. Think about them. Pray about them. Do not be hasty to generalize and dismiss opinions that differ from your own. Recognize, as Redden reported, that there are many sides to this complex discussion—but do not let that discourage you from staying involved in it. And remember that in times like these, Covenant is not the only school in this position.

“Green initiative” culminates in formation of new Campus Stewardship Committee

Thanks to the CSC, you’ll soon have a new way to get rid of an old Bagpipe.

Burden on students, Senate to make program succeed

Covenant’s campus may officially be “going green.” In early April, Student Senate approved a new student committee, the Campus Stewardship Committee (CSC). After eighteen months of setbacks and trial runs, the committee was finally approved as part of Covenant’s developing recycling program.
This move is a direct result of a student-powered “green initiative,” the informal umbrella term for environment-conscious developments on campus.
The new committee’s first responsibility will be to begin implementation of a formal recycling program, something many students have been highly anticipating.
Senate approved the committee after hearing a proposal from Student Body President Kat Kimball and Sophomore Class President Alex Anderson. Kimball and Anderson have been collaborating with students, Facilities Services, and Student Development to bring recycling to Covenant’s campus.
Before implementing a formal plan, Kimball, Anderson, and students in Andreas and Founders piloted a program to test recycling, dubbing it the Andreas Test Plan.
The goal of this plan was to prove that a recycling program at Covenant would be practical, clean, and sustainable. Evaluation sheets were filled out by participating halls. The plan was run for eight weeks with the final evaluation taking place after Spring Break.
“Ultimately, Facilities Management and Planning responded well to the results of the plan and are supportive of campus recycling, but they just don’t have the resources to help us right now,” said Anderson.
The burden, then, remains with students. This conclusion led Senate to form the Campus Stewardship Committee.
The CSC will function like a club, with a Senate-approved budget. However, unlike a club, students on the committee will receive practical service hours for their work. While the organization of the committee is yet to be determined, the CSC will likely include Senate members and students who are passionate about environmental initiatives.
The plan is for the CSC to provide immediate infrastructure for Andreas and Founders halls to implement the recycling program next fall. The “far-off hope,” according to Anderson, is to bring recycling to the Maclellan/Rymer and Carter Halls over the next two years.
Long term, the committee will oversee many more stewardship initiatives, including food waste and conservation of energy.
For the present, Anderson encourages students to think about conserving energy and stewarding their resources. The heart of the “green initiative,” both Kimball and Anderson say, is stewardship and restoration.
“There are a lot of causes out there that are important,” says Anderson, “But this is something you can be doing right now. Turn your light off when you leave your room. Put an aluminum can in a recycling bin.”

Halls closing: Lower enrollment allows for renovation of Gallery, 3rd and 4th South

BY REBECCA NEWMAN

Say goodbye to The Gallery for at least a year

A few days after Covenant College posted its fall of 2009 Resident Assistant list in early March, rumors began swirling in Founders Hall about the conspicuous lack of a fifth female RA in the building, suggesting that one of the girl halls there would be closing.

It wasn’t until a couple of weeks ago that Deans Brad Voyles and Emily Ford confirmed these suspicions and announced the closing of Gallery, as well as of 3rd and 4th South in Carter Hall. Voyles and Ford wrote a letter to the three halls attributing the reason for the temporary closing to “preventive maintenance,” saying that these halls are in need of refresher renovations.

Gallery, in particular, is in desperate need of new carpet, said Meredith Hall, the RA of Gallery for the past two years. According to Facilities Services, this kind of amenity is difficult to replace in an inhabited hall.

Jordan Harwood, RA of 3rd South, also said her hall could use many repairs, mentioning that her girls frequently have no heat or hot water.

The original BUILD campaign to renovate Carter called for the shifting of the displaced Carter halls to Andreas. Funds raised for the next BUILD phase, however, were not adequate, so only key repairs will be made at present, and only in the south halls.

Enrollment is also an important factor in the hall closings. Enrollment numbers are dropping at Covenant and there are already many half-empty halls on campus. Hopes are that dispersed residents from the halls will be able to fill in gaps elsewhere on campus.

“Obviously, if enrollment was sky-high, we wouldn’t be able to do this,” said Ford.

3rd South is being encouraged to move to 5th South, where hall member Brittany Luther will be RA next year. Harwood will likewise be RA on 4th Central, and 4th South residents have been offered the option of following her there. “We didn’t want [the halls being shut down] to affect community,” said Ford.

Residents of the three closing halls will consequently have “first dibs” on rooming for next year, according to Voyles. “They are displaced, so we are going to do what we can to make things easier,” he said. The displaced girls can sign up after squatters, but before freshmen.

The housing department is also making special considerations for the residents currently in 4-person rooms who want to stay in the same arrangement, even offering sleep/study options at the same price on new halls.

Hall sees the fact that this change will make the remaining halls fuller as a definite benefit. “The emptiness of the hall can be depressing,” she noted.

But she and other girls on Gallery are hardly ecstatic. While Hall is a senior and will not be returning next year, several of her fellow Gallery residents are juniors and have never lived anywhere else at Covenant.

Samantha Berg and her roommate Megan Davis are both juniors on Gallery who are considering moving to the apartments next year. “It would be awkward moving to a new hall as seniors and having to adjust to a new hall identity,” said Berg.

Hall says that most of the Gallery residents are moving to various halls in Founders.

Whether Gallery and 3rd and 4th South residents can expect to return to their halls next year remains to be seen. There is no set deadline on renovations, and enrollment numbers could be substantially higher next year.

“The level and scope of maintenance and/or repairs in the unoccupied area has not been determined,” said David Northcutt, director of Facilities Management & Planning. “It’s hard to say how long it will take,” agreed Voyles.

What is certain is that the college will save a good bit of money having three fewer halls on campus to maintain. The strategic planning resulting in the closing of the two South halls and Gallery will result in less cash going towards utilities and cut down on unused space on the halls. “It’s not ideal,” said Voyles, “But necessary nonetheless.”